Appeal 2006-1290 Application 10/144,345 FINDINGS OF FACT Appellant invented a recloseable bag which includes, as depicted in Figures 2 and 3, opposing side walls 11 and 12. The top edge of the side wall 11 is below the top edge side wall 12. A closure member 14 is adapted to close the opposing side walls. A pleat 13 is included proximate the closure member 14. The specification defines a pleat as an inward fold extending laterally across the width of a side wall 11. The pleat forms a pocket inside the sidewall (Spec. 5). The pleat has an extended and retracted position. In the extended position the pleat enables the sidewall to expand outwardly farther than the sidewall could expand without the fold (Spec. 5). The closure member, as recited in claims 11, 16, and 26 is bowed when the pleat is in the extended position. The closure member, as recited in claims 11, 16, and 26 has first and second portions which are disposed above the top edge of the side wall 11 (Fig. 3). Watanabe discloses a packaging bag that includes a gusset 3 on the outside of the bag (Fig. 1). A small bag 10 is created by adhering one side of gusset 3 to the main body of the bag (0009). Milk or a small object such as a spoon may be inserted into the bag 10 (0009). The gusset 3 is not an inward fold extending laterally across the side of the sidewall of the bag and does not permit the sidewalls of the bag to expand outwardly farther than the sidewall could expand without the fold. In addition, the gusset 3 does not affect the closure 5 when it is in an extended position. Yano discloses a bag having opposing side walls with lateral pleats 3a. The pleats allow the bag to expand when filled (Yano 4, Fig. 2). The closure member 6, when the bag is upright, is not integral with the top edge of one of the side walls. Rather, the closure member 6 is disposed parallel to 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013