Ex Parte Doll - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                    
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                           

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                               ____________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                    
                                        Ex parte RONALD J. DOLL                                                
                                               ____________                                                    
                                           Appeal No. 2006-1294                                                
                                        Application No. 10/430,963                                             
                                               ____________                                                    
                                             ON BRIEF                                                          
                                       _____________                                                           

             Before PATE, HORNER and FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.                                    
             PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                

                                       DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      

                                       STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                   

                   This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-3, 27, 28 and 31-35 and              
             the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 29 and 39 amended after final rejection.                   
             Claims 6-8 and 30 are allowed.  These are all the claims remaining in the                         
             application.                                                                                      





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013