Appeal No. 2006-1294 Application No. 10/430,963 The claimed invention is a protective guard for a coupling between a pair of rotating shaft components. The guard has first and second halves that are connected with a hinge. Extending from both sides of the protective housing are sleeves with cut lines so that they may be trimmed to provide the length necessary to surround the rotating shaft. The claimed invention may be further understood with reference to the appealed claims appended to appellant’s brief. The references of record relied upon by the examiner as evidence of anticipation and obviousness are: Pelton 1,192,342 Jul. 25, 1916 Hogan 4,211,519 Jul. 8, 1980 Powell 6,190,261 Feb. 20, 2001 Claims 1 through 3, 29, 31, 35 and 39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by Pelton. Claims 1 through 3, 27, 29, 31 through 35 and 39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by Hogan. Claims 31 through 35 and 39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by Powell. Claim 28 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Pelton in view of Powell. Claims 29, 33 and 39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112 second paragraph as indefinite. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013