Ex Parte Doll - Page 2



             Appeal No. 2006-1294                                                                              
             Application No. 10/430,963                                                                        

                   The claimed invention is a protective guard for a coupling between a pair of                
             rotating shaft components.  The guard has first and second halves that are                        
             connected with a hinge.  Extending from both sides of the protective housing are                  
             sleeves with cut lines so that they may be trimmed to provide the length necessary                
             to surround the rotating shaft.  The claimed invention may be further understood                  
             with reference to the appealed claims appended to appellant’s brief.                              
                   The references of record relied upon by the examiner as evidence of                         
             anticipation and obviousness are:                                                                 
             Pelton    1,192,342   Jul. 25, 1916                                                               
             Hogan    4,211,519   Jul.    8, 1980                                                              
             Powell    6,190,261   Feb. 20, 2001                                                               
                    Claims 1 through 3, 29, 31, 35 and 39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                     
             102 as anticipated by Pelton.                                                                     
                    Claims 1 through 3, 27, 29, 31 through 35 and 39 stand rejected under                      
             35 U.S.C.  § 102 as anticipated by Hogan.                                                         
                    Claims 31 through 35 and 39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as                        
             anticipated by Powell.                                                                            
                    Claim 28 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over                        
             Pelton in view of Powell.                                                                         
                    Claims 29, 33 and 39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112 second                           
             paragraph as indefinite.                                                                          




                                                      2                                                        



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013