Appeal 2006-1305
Application 10/236,270
Accordingly, we sustain the rejection of claims 1 and 3-20 under
35 U.S.C § 103(a) as unpatentable over the admitted prior art (Specification
1-2) in view of Watanabe and Daughenbaugh.
CONCLUSION
The Examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 3-9, and 18-20 under 35 U.S.C
§ 103(a) as unpatentable over Watanabe in view of Daughenbaugh is
affirmed.
The Examiner’s rejection of claims 1 and 3-20 under 35 U.S.C
§ 103(a) as unpatentable over the admitted prior art (Specification 1-2) in
view of Watanabe and Daughenbaugh is affirmed.
Thus, the decision of the Examiner is AFFIRMED.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED
clj
17
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013