The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ARDESHIR JEHANGIR SIDHWA ____________ Appeal 2006-1512 Application 10/131,455 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: July 31, 2007 ____________ Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1 and 5-19. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We AFFIRM.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013