Ex Parte Shealy - Page 37

            Appeal 2006-1601                                                                            
            Application 09/828,579                                                                      

            nothing in the claim precludes the systematic method that governs the reasoning             
            from being textual instructions about the reasoning to be performed by a person.            
            For purposes of this rejection we adopt this broader definition of “logic.”                 
                  Thus, we conclude that claim 11 merely requires a paper with (1) printed              
            textual instructions for a person to follow to identify that a future rate plan is to be    
            changed, (2) printed textual instructions for a person to follow to select the future       
            rate plan desired, and (3) printed textual instructions for a person to follow to           
            implement the future rate change, so as to provide information for use in future rate       
            changes in a billing system.                                                                
                  We conclude that the “logic” of claim 11 does not require a computer                  
            program that implements functions on a computer system or a data structure that             
            modifies a function of the computer system.  Rather, the “logic” may be merely              
            textual instructions that do not impart any functionality to a computer system, i.e.,       
            the “logic” is merely non-functional descriptive material.  See Interim Guidelines          
            for Examination of Patent Applications for Patent Subject Matter Eligibility                
            (Interim Guidelines), 1300 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 142, 151 (Nov. 22, 2005).                  
            (“‘[F]unctional descriptive material’ consists of data structures and computer              
            programs which impart functionality when employed as a computer component.                  
            . . .  ‘Non-functional descriptive material’ includes but is not limited to music,          
            literary works and a compilation or mere arrangement of data.”).                            
                  When nonfunctional descriptive material is recorded on some                           
                  computer-readable medium, in a computer or on an electromagnetic                      
                  carrier signal, it is not statutory since no requisite functionality is               
                  present  to  satisfy  the  practical application  requirement.  Merely                
                  claiming nonfunctional descriptive material, i.e., abstract ideas, stored             
                  in a computer-readable medium, in a computer, on an electromagnetic                   
                  carrier signal does not make it statutory. See Diehr, 450 U.S. at 185-                
                  86, 209 USPQ at 8 (noting that the claims for an algorithm in Benson                  

                                                  37                                                    

Page:  Previous  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013