The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HERBERT E. SCHWARTZ, PRASANNA MALAVIYA,
and MARK J. PELO
__________
Appeal 2006-1953
Application 10/195,347
Technology Center 3700
__________
Decided: May 21, 2007
__________
Before DONALD E. ADAMS, DEMETRA J. MILLS, and
ERIC GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a device
and method for repairing cartilage. The Examiner has rejected the claims as
anticipated or obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We
affirm in part.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013