1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ____________________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ____________________
10
11 Ex parte GEORGE HARRY HOFFMAN, DANIEL SECHRIST,
12 ANTHONY FRANK MENNINGER
13 and MICHAEL JAMES BURK
14 ____________________
15
16 Appeal 2006-2018
17 Application 09/815,7311
18 Technology Center 3600
19 ____________________
20
21 Decided: March 22, 2007
22 ____________________
23
24 Before: TERRY J. OWENS, STUART S. LEVY, and ANTON W.
25 FETTING Administrative Patent Judges.
26
27 LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
28
29 DECISION ON APPEAL
30
31 STATEMENT OF CASE
32 Applicant appeals from a final rejection of claims 1 to 18 under
33 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b)
34 (2002).
1 Application filed March 23, 2001. The real party in interest is
RESTAURANT SERVICES, INC.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013