The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RAM H. PAUL,
DANIEL J. SIROTA, and
PAUL D. AMARANT
__________
Appeal No. 2006-2037
Application No. 10/414,939
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before ADAMS, MILLS, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.
ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-4, 6-11, 15-18, and 20-24. The examiner
objected to claims 12, 13, and 14, the only remaining pending claims, “as being
dependent upon a rejected base claim,” however, the examiner has indicated
that these claims would be “allowable if rewritten in independent form including
all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.” Brief, page 2.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013