1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ___________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ___________
10
11 Ex parte JAMES C. CRONE
12 ___________
13
14 Appeal 2006-2109
15 Application 10/680,678
16 Technology Center 3600
17 ___________
18
19 Decided: June 25, 2007
20 ___________
21
22 Before HUBERT C. LORIN, ANTON W. FETTING, and JOSEPH A.
23 FISCHETTI, Administrative Patent Judges.
24 Opinion for the Board by FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge.
25 Concurring Opinion by FISCHETTI, Administrative Patent Judge.
26 FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge.
27
28 DECISION ON APPEAL
29
30
31 STATEMENT OF CASE
32 This appeal from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-20, the only claims
33 pending in this application, arises under 35 U.S.C. § 134. We have jurisdiction
34 over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
35
36 We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013