Ex Parte Crone - Page 3

            Appeal 2006-2109                                                                                 
            Application 10/680,678                                                                           

        1       This appeal arises from the Examiner’s Final Rejection, mailed February 2,                   
        2   2005.  The Appellant filed an Appeal Brief in support of the appeal on April 1,                  
        3   2005, and the Examiner mailed an Examiner’s Answer to the Appeal Brief on                        
        4   April 27, 2005.  A Reply Brief was filed on June 2, 2005.  The appeal was                        
        5   remanded by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences back to the Examiner                   
        6   to reconsider a rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 101 on March 2, 2006.  The Examiner                  
        7   mailed a second Examiner’s Answer to the Appeal Brief on March 27, 2006.  A                      
        8   second Reply Brief was filed on May 2, 2006.  Generic references below to an                     
        9   Examiner’s Answer and a Reply Brief refer to the second submission of each                       
       10   occurring in 2006.                                                                               
       11                                       PRIOR ART                                                    
       12       The Examiner relies upon the following references as evidence of                             
       13   unpatentability:                                                                                 
       14 Helbling  US 5,724,518 Mar. 3, 199814                                                                                                   
       15 Burke  US 6,088,682 Jul. 11, 200015                                                                                                   
       16                                                                                                    
       17                                     REJECTIONS1                                                    
       18       Appellant seek review of the following Examiner’s rejections.                                
       19       Claims 1-6, 11-14, and 19-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                      
       20   obvious over Helbling.                                                                           
       21       Claims 7-10 and 15-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over                
       22   Helbling and Burke.                                                                              

                                                                                                            
            1 The Examiner withdrew a rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Answer 2)                             
                                                      3                                                      


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013