1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ___________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ___________
10
11 Ex parte MICHAEL RAY CRABTREE, SUHWE LEE, and NANCY QUEK
12 ___________
13
14 Appeal 2006-2157
15 Application 09/752,204
16 Technology Center 1700
17 ___________
18
19 Decided: March 28, 2007
20 ___________
21
22 Before TERRY J. OWENS, LINDA E. HORNER, and ANTON W. FETTING,
23 Administrative Patent Judges.
24 FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge.
25 DECISION ON APPEAL
26
27
28 STATEMENT OF CASE
29 This appeal involves claims 1, 3-5, 7-10, 12-34, 36-38, 40-43, 45-69, 71-73,
30 75-78, and 80-101, the only claims pending in this application. We have
31 jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.
32
33 We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013