The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte NIKOLAOS SARANDITIS ____________ Appeal 2006-2171 Application 10/840,715 Technology Center 3600 ____________ Decided: March 27, 2007 ____________ Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, PETER F. KRATZ, and CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims 1-5, 8, 10-18, 25, 26, 31 and 34-36. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 134. We AFFIRM.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013