Appeal 2006-2206 Application 10/743,380 wherein the frame has one or more support portions and one or both of the support portions are embedded in a bed underlying the water as part of the insertion step. 7. A screening device for determining fishing conditions comprising: a) a frame having a pair of side rails and at least two cross members, the cross members interconnecting the pair of side rails, the side rails include at least one handle portion and one support portion; b) a flexible screen having opposing ends and opposing sides, each opposing side aligned and attached to a respective side rail, at least one opposing end being a free end and extending between the pair of side rails, the flexible screen having a width such that the free end is curved in shape during use. 8. The screening device of claim 7, wherein each cross member further comprises: a pair of cross member segments, each segment pivotally attached to a side rail at one end, other ends of each segment pivotally attached together so that the cross member segments and side rails can fold up. The Examiner relies on the following prior art references as evidence of unpatentability: Crane US 1,036,574 Aug. 27, 1912 Flynn US 5,722,196 Mar. 3, 1998 The rejections as presented by the Examiner are as follows: 1. Claims 1, 2, 4, 7, 9, and 10 are rejected under § 102(b) as being unpatentable over Flynn. 2. Claims 5 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Flynn. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013