The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________________
Ex parte JAMES CASAZZA
____________________
Appeal 2006-2228
Application 10/231,678
Technology Center 2100
____________________
Decided: September 6, 2007
____________________
Before MICHAEL R. FLEMING, Chief Administrative Patent Judge,
GARY V. HARKCOM, Vice-Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and
LEE E. BARRETT, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and
ALLEN R. MacDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.1
PER CURIAM
DECISION ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
1 Originally heard by APJs Jerry Smith, Krass, and MacDonald. APJs
Barrett and Blankenship replace APJs Jerry Smith and Krass. Legal support
for substituting one Board member for another can be found in In re Bose
Corp., 772 F.2d 866, 869, 227 USPQ 1, 4 (Fed. Cir. 1985). Additionally,
the panel was expanded to include Chief APJ Fleming and Vice-Chief APJ
Harkcom.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013