The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte STUART W. FLOCKENCIER ____________ Appeal 2006-2232 Application 10/242,188 Technology Center 3600 ____________ Decided: March 27, 2007 ____________ Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, LINDA E. HORNER, and ANTON W. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges. CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellant appeals from the final rejection of claims 1-8, 10, 12-27, 29, 30-34, 37-39 and 42-51 under 35 U.S.C. § 134. Claims 9, 11, 28, 35, 36, 40 and 41 have been found allowable if drafted to be independent from thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013