Ex Parte Flockencier - Page 6

              Appeal 2006-2232                                                                     
              Application 10/242,188                                                               
              maximum gain.  If this goal is not achieved and the signal is 111 and the            
              present gain is maximum gain,  the gain is changed to the minimum gain.              
                    Kovtun describes a automatic gain control (AGC) which monitors the             
              amplitude of an output signal 18 and adjusts the gain to keep the maximum            
              amplitude within a certain range (Kovtun, col. 4, ll. 7-9).  The Kovtun ACG          
              is used in the environment of an  ECG machine.  Kovtun discloses that in             
              this environment, the amplitude or gain of the output of the ECG machine             
              must be controlled so that changes not related to the condition of the heart         
              do not cause variations that are not indicative of cardiac function and              
              thereby make interpretation by a physician more difficult (Kovtun, col. 2, ll.       
              7-23).  These changes not related to the condition of the heart amount to an         
              unwanted signal or noise.   Kovtun teaches that when this change in the gain         
              is controlled manually by the physician, it detracts the physician’s attention       
              away from the patient (Kovtun, col. 2, ll 22-23).                                    
                                      PRINCIPLES OF LAW                                            
                    Two criteria have evolved for determining whether prior art is                 
              analogous: (1) whether the art is from the same field of endeavor, regardless        
              of the problem addressed, and (2) if the reference is not within the field of        
              the inventor's endeavor, whether the reference still is reasonably pertinent to      
              the particular problem with which the inventor is involved.  In re Clay, 966         
              F.2d 656, 658-59, 23 USPQ2d 1058, 1060 (Fed. Cir. 1992).  See also In re             
              Deminski, 796 F.2d 436, 442, 230 USPQ 313, 315 (Fed. Cir. 1986); In re               
              Wood, 599 F.2d 1032, 1036, 202 USPQ 171, 174 (CCPA 1979).  Common                    
              sense is used to decide which field a person of ordinary skill in the art would      
              reasonably expected to look for a solution to the problem.  In re Kahn, 441          
              F.3d 977, 986, 78 USPQ2d, 1329, 1335 (Fed, Cir. 2006).                               

                                                6                                                  

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013