-The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JEFFREY J. WALLS, JANIE AMELIA LEDET,
and PAUL MICHAEL ANDERSON
____________
Appeal 2006-2281
Application 09/974,555
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: April 30, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, and
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Final Rejection of
claims 1-19. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Appellants’ claimed invention relates to a system and method for the
collective rendering of a display by a plurality of networked slave computers
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013