Appeal 2006-2281
Application 09/974,555
which are configured at a master computer. A compatible specific operating
configuration for the slave computers is communicated across the network to
each of the plurality of slave computers.
We affirm.
Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and it reads as follows:
1. A method for configuring a plurality of networked slave computers
to cooperate to collectively render a display comprising:
specifying, at a master computer, compatible operating configuration
for each of the plurality of slave computers; and
communicating, across the network, the specified configuration to
each of the plurality of slave computers.
The Examiner relies on the following prior art reference to show
unpatentability:
Ludtke US 6,501,441 B1 Dec. 31, 2002
(filed Jun. 18, 1999)
Claims 1-19, all of the appealed claims, stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Ludtke.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the Examiner,
reference is made to the Briefs and Answer for the respective details. Only
those arguments actually made by Appellants have been considered in this
decision. Arguments which Appellants could have made but chose not to
make in the Briefs have not been considered and are deemed waived [see 37
C.F.R. § 41.37(c)(1)(vii)].
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013