The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte CHARLES EDWARD BOWERS
______________
Appeal 2006-2287
Application 10/631,320
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: August 28, 2007
_______________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicant appeals to the Board from the decision of the Primary
Examiner finally rejecting claims 29 through 48 in the Office Action mailed
July 28, 2005. 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a)
(2005).
We reverse the decision of the Primary Examiner.
Claim 29 illustrates Appellant’s invention of a method of making a
Saxony carpet, and is representative of the claims on appeal.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013