The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte JOHN FREDERICK PORTER and GERAINT ROBERTS ________________ Appeal 2006-2299 Application 10/615,671 Technology Center 1700 ________________ Decided: August 17, 2007 ________________ Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 1 34 from the final rejection of claims 1-9 and 22-29. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6. The Appellants claim a fabric reinforcement useful in reinforcing an alkaline matrix such as cement comprising a plurality of warp yarns having a first twist, a plurality of weft yarns having a second twist greater than thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013