The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
___________
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte JI-YOUNG LEE
___________
Appeal 2006-2328
Reissue Application 10/131,049
Patent 6,064,443
___________
Heard: December 11, 2006
___________
Decided: February 23, 2007
___________
Before MARTIN, BARRETT, and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the final
rejection of claims 1, 21, 26, 27, 35, 57, and 58. Original claims 2-20 and
new claims 37-56 have been allowed. New claims 22-25, 28-34, and 36 are
objected to. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We affirm-in-part but enter new grounds of rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013