The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte GARY H. ANDERS
and DANIEL W. KING
______________
Appeal 2006-2334
Application 09/909,913
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: July 31, 2007
_______________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary
Examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 7, 9 through 11, 14 through 20,
27, 29 through 34, 37 through 42, 92 through 94, 97 through 101, and 103 in
the Office Action mailed April 15, 2005. Subsequently, the Examiner held
claims 4, 5, and 30 drawn to allowable subject matter, leaving claims
1 through 3, 6, 7, 9 through 11, 14 through 20, 27, 29, 31 through 34,
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013