Ex Parte Kelly et al - Page 1



                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                           
                            for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                   ____________                                                         
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                   ____________                                                         
                            Ex parte SEAN M. KELLY, KARL J. HALTINER, JR.,                                              
                                       and CHRISTOPHER M. DEMINCO                                                       
                                                   ____________                                                         
                                                 Appeal 2006-2637                                                       
                                              Application 10/178,878                                                    
                                              Technology Center 1700                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                         
                                              Decided: April 27, 2007                                                   
                                                   ____________                                                         

                 Before CHUNG K. PAK, PETER F. KRATZ, and CATHERINE Q. TIMM,                                            
                 Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                          
                 KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                    

                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                        This is an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-9                             
                 and 12-31.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.                                   









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013