Ex Parte Kelly et al - Page 5

                 Appeal 2006-2637                                                                                       
                 Application 10/178,878                                                                                 

                 communication between said lower and upper chambers and the top plate is                               
                 mounted to a fuel cell stack and a reformer.   See rejected independent                                
                 claims 1, 25, and 28.                                                                                  
                        In asserting that Mukerjee anticipates appealed claims 1-3, 6-9, and                            
                 12-31, the Examiner contends that:                                                                     
                               Mukerjee et al. teaches that the manifold is an assembly                                 
                        comprising a plurality of components including a bottom,                                        
                        middle, and top plate as well as a lower partitioned element and                                
                        that said top plate has a means for mounting the stack and                                      
                        reformer. Mukerjee et al. also teaches that the partitioned                                     
                        elements are integral with the manifold (claim 1 and column 6,                                  
                        lines 28 et seq.). Because of the open claim language and                                       
                        broadness of the recited claim terms used in claims 12-16, the                                  
                        Mukerjee et al. reference reads on the claims as so recited. The                                
                        examiner also notes that the orientation words used are relative                                
                        to a reference point, which has not been provided by applicants.                                
                        Therefore the specified parts according to the orientation words                                
                        can be situated practically anywhere within the apparatus.                                      
                 Answer 4.                                                                                              
                        Appellants contend that:                                                                        
                               … the Mukerjee reference does not anticipate all of the                                  
                        limitations included in claims 1,25 and 28.  Specifically, the                                  
                        Examiner's interpretation that the housing (80) teaches a middle                                
                        plate, an upper partitioned element, and a lower partitioned                                    
                        element is unsupported by the Murkerjee reference….                                             
                               As best seen in FIG. 4 of the Murkerjee reference, the                                   
                        housing (80) is merely a single partitioned element having a                                    
                        plurality of chambers represented by passages (87, 91, 95, 99,                                  
                        102) that extend between top and bottom plates (82, 84).  The                                   
                        housing (80) does not include a pattern of upper chambers                                       
                        defined between the top plate (84) and a middle plate, and a                                    
                        pattern of lower chambers defined between the bottom plate                                      
                        (82) and a middle plate.  Appellants submit that interpreting the                               
                        passages (87, 91, 95, 99, 102) as both the upper and lower                                      

                                                           5                                                            

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013