Ex Parte Watanabe et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                     
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                ____________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                ____________                                                    
                            Ex parte MASAKO WATANABE, KAZUAKI ANO                                               
                                         and MASAZUMI AMAGAI                                                    
                                                ____________                                                    
                                              Appeal 2006-2676                                                  
                                           Application 10/341,140                                               
                                           Technology Center 2800                                               
                                                ____________                                                    
                                           Decided: March 5, 2007                                               
                                                ____________                                                    

                Before JAMES D. THOMAS, KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, and JEAN R.                                        
                HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                           
                THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134, Appellants have appealed to the Board                       
                from the Examiner’s Final Rejection of claims 1-8 and 15.                                       
                       Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced below:                                  
                       1.  A semiconductor device comprising:                                                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013