Ex Parte Damman et al - Page 3

                Appeal No. 2006-2680                                                                            
                Application No. 10/710,187                                                                      

                modifier being based on the total combined weight of the thermoplastic                          
                molding composition.                                                                            
                4.  The composition of Claim 1, wherein the polyester comprises                                 
                polyethylene terephthalate.                                                                     
                2.  ANTICIPATION BY LIU ‘380                                                                    
                       Claims 1-3 and 8-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                     
                anticipated by Liu ‘380.1  The Examiner reasons: “Run 6 in Table 1 column                       
                16 discloses a composition containing applicants' components in applicants'                     
                amount having a component ‘PEE’ as in applicants' polyetherimide; KM                            
                653/315 graft copolymer as in applicants' impact modifier and polybutylene                      
                terephthalate polyester (Valox 315).”  (Office action mailed October 13,                        
                2004, 2-3; cited in Answer 4.)                                                                  
                       Appellants argue that the compositions disclosed in Liu ‘380 contain                     
                “what the patentees . . . have named as a polyetherimide ester (PEIE),” a                       
                product which is not encompassed by the term “polyetherimide” in claim 1.                       
                (Br. 3.)                                                                                        
                       Appellants argue that “[t]he term polyetherimide (PEI) has a                             
                recognized meaning in the art, which is the meaning given in the present                        
                application.”  (Id.)  Appellants point out that volume 12 of the Encyclopedia                   
                of Polymer Science and Engineering (1988), at pages 371 and 372 (Table 5),                      
                explains that “polymers derived from condensation of diamines and                               
                dianhydrides, which have imide containing groups disposed between                               
                successive aromatic ether bonds are called polyetherimides.”  (Br. 3.)                          
                Appellants urge that this definition is consistent with both structure II in                    
                                                                                                               
                1 Liu, U.S. Patent 4,814,380, issued March 21, 1989.                                            

                                                       3                                                        

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013