Ex Parte Hudak - Page 4

                Appeal No. 2006-2699                                                                          
                Application No. 09/915,494                                                                    

                2.  ANTICIPATION                                                                              
                      Claims 74, 75, 79, 85-92, and 94-102 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                     
                § 102(e) as anticipated by Cui.1  The Examiner states that Cui describes a                    
                device for collecting and testing a fluid specimen, the device having “a first                
                compartment (chamber) for fluid collection”; “a second compartment                            
                (reservoir) for receiving a portion of the fluid”; and “a valve interposed                    
                between the first compartment and the second compartment (Fig. 1 and Fig.                     
                9).”  (Answer 3-4.)  The Examiner argues that the “valve comprises a well                     
                (22) (compartment) for holding an aliquot of the specimen” and that “the                      
                second compartment (reservoir) is spaced to allow receipt of a test device                    
                such as a test strip (col 5).”  (Answer 4.)                                                   
                      The Examiner also argues that, in Figure 2, Cui depicts a valve                         
                comprising “a well (valve compartment) in fluid communication with the                        
                chamber.  One skilled in the art would recognize that when the valve is                       
                actuated that the well will be horizontal at the 3:00 . . . position (second                  
                position) (would not be in fluid communication with the chamber or the                        
                reservoir) and then proceed to the 6:00 . . . position in which the well (valve               
                compartment) would be in fluid communication with the reservoir and not                       
                the chamber.”  (Id.)                                                                          
                      In addition, the Examiner states that the recitation “‘the valve being                  
                inoperable after a first actuation’ . . . is not given patentable weight because              
                it is [the] intended use of the valve.”  (Id.)  The Examiner also argues that,                
                because Cui discloses “structurally the same device and valve as recited in                   

                                                                                                             
                1 Cui, U.S. Patent No. 6,576,193 B1, issued June 10, 2003.                                    

                                                      4                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013