Appeal No. 2006-2699
Application No. 09/915,494
SUMMARY
The Examiner has not adequately shown that the claims are
anticipated or obvious over the applied prior art. We therefore reverse the
anticipation and obviousness rejections. However, we affirm the provisional
double patenting rejection.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
Toni R. Scheiner )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Eric Grimes )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
Nancy J. Linck )
Administrative Patent Judge )
EG/MLM/jlb
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013