1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
2 not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
6 _____________
7
8 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
9 AND INTERFERENCES
10 _____________
11
12 Ex parte MIKHAIL MIKHAILOVICH TIMOFEEV
13 _____________
14
15 Appeal No. 2006-2796
16 Application No. 09/230,439
17 Technology Center 3600
18 ______________
19
20 Decided: May 29, 2007
21 _______________
22
22 Before TERRY J. OWENS, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and ANTON W. FETTING,
23
23 Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25
25 OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28
29
30 DECISION ON APPEAL
31 The Appellant appeals from a rejection of claims 18-20, 22, 27-30 and 32-
32 35. Claim 31, which is the only other pending claim, stands objected to as
33 dependent from a rejected base claim but allowable if rewritten in independent
34 form.
35
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013