The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JAN HERSCHEL and HANS-FRIEDRICH KRULL ____________ Appeal 2006-2825 Application 10/691,916 Technology Center 3600 ____________ Decided: April 24, 2007 ____________ Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and LINDA E. HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE Jan Herschel and Hans-Friedrich Krull (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-10, all the pending claims. We have jurisdiction over this appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013