Ex Parte Hewett - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                         
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                                  Ex parte CHRISTOPHER B. HEWETT                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2006-2827                                                
                                          Application 09/883,893                                            
                                         Technology Center 3600                                             
                                              ____________                                                  
                                         Decided:  August 23, 2007                                          
                                              ____________                                                  
            Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and                                           
            DAVID B. WALKER, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  
            Opinion by WALKER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                 

            Dissenting opinion by PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013