Appeal 2006-2836
Application 09/923,673
For the above reasons we conclude that the Appellants’ claimed
invention would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art over
the applied prior art.
DECISION
The rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1-7, 10, 19, 20 and 25-
27 over Gatley in view of Piechowiak and Itkis, and claims 21-24 over
Gatley in view of Piechowiak, Itkis and Thomas, are affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a) .
AFFIRMED
vsh
PTT LLC (D/B/A HIGH 5 GAMES)
1200 MACARTHUR BLVD
MAHWAH NJ 07430
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Last modified: September 9, 2013