Appeal 2006-2854
Application 10/348,165
Chen ‘916 US 6,361,916 Mar. 26, 2002
Seul US 2002/0090613 Jul. 11, 2002
Banerjee US 6,964,747 Nov. 15, 2005
The Examiner entered the following grounds of rejection:
I. Claims 1 and 44 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
unpatentable over Kemeny.
II. Claims 1 and 44 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
unpatentable over Hair.
III. Claims 1 and 44 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
unpatentable over Chen ‘916 in view of Hair.
IV. Claims 1, 3-5, 7, 9-11, 15-26, and 43-44 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Chen ‘363 in view of Hair, further
in view of Seul.
V. Claims 3-5 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
unpatentable over Kemeny in view of Chen ‘363 or Hair in view of Chen
‘363.
VI. Claims 9-11 and 15-29stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
unpatentable over Kemeny in view of Chen ‘363/ Hair in view of Chen ‘363,
further in view of Seul.
VII. Claims 12-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
unpatentable over Kemeny in view of Chen ‘363/ Hair in view of Chen
‘363/Chen ‘363 in view of Hair /further in view of Seul and further in view
of Wright.
VIII. Claim 30 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
unpatentable over ‘Kemeny in view of Chen ‘363/Hair et al. in view of Chen
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013