The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JANE BJORKSTROM, GORAN BODEMAR,
GUSTA LINDEWALD, and LARS-BORJE SJOBERG
____________
Appeal 2006-2858
Application 10/169,910
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: March 27, 2007
____________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the Examiner's final rejection of claims
1, 2, and 4 through 22. Claims 23 through 26, the other claims pending in
the above-identified application, stand withdrawn from consideration by the
Examiner as being directed to a non-elected invention. We have jurisdiction
pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013