The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte BOBBY N. GLOVER, LIAN-FENG HUANG,
ROBERT W. LANCASTER, STACEY T. LONG, MICHELE C.
RIZZOLIO, ERIC A. SCHMITT, and BARRY R. SICKLES
__________
Appeal 2006-2861
Application 10/007,272
Technology Center 1600
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before SCHEINER, GRIMES, and LINCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
Opinion by GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge. Opinion concurring in
part and dissenting in part by LINCK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a
pharmaceutical composition and a treatment method. The Examiner has
rejected the claims as anticipated. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 6(b). We reverse.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013