Appeal 2006-2870 Application 10/401,509 We further find to be without merit Appellants’ arguments (Br. 9) which rely on the Hobbs reference, incorporated by reference at page 10, line 26 of the Specification, as disclosing that scatterometry may include measuring diffraction efficiency of a test structure. As pointed out by the Examiner (Answer 5), Hobbs discloses the measurement of diffraction efficiency to determine the line dimension of a wafer in a photolithography process, not to determine the overlay between two periodic structures. We further agree with the Examiner that Appellants’ reliance (Specification 11:4-7) on the Xu reference (WO 99/45340) does not overcome the inadequacies of the disclosure since a description of measuring diffraction efficiency, which is essential material to Appellants’ claimed invention, cannot be incorporated by reference to patents or applications published by foreign countries or a regional patent office.1 We also find no error in the Examiner’s reliance (Answer 6-7) on In re Petering, 301 F.2d 676, 679, 133 USPQ 275, 278 (CCPA 1962) and In re Sivaramakrishnan, 673 F.2d 1383, 1384, 213 USPQ 441, 442 (CCPA 1982) as support for the Examiner’s position as to the inadequacy of Appellants’ disclosure in providing support for the claimed measurement technique species of detecting diffraction efficiency. Appellants’ arguments (Br. 11- 16; Reply Br. 2-4) contend that the examples of various measurement devices and resist properties provided in the Specification constitute a 1 We make the observation that, even if the disclosure of the Xu reference were properly incorporated into the Appellants’ Specification, the deficiencies in the original disclosure would not be overcome. In our view, the disclosure of Xu is directed to, at best, the measurement of diffraction efficiency to analyze the diffraction properties of a single layer structure, not to the detection of a lateral shift among plural layers of a multi-layer structure as claimed. 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013