The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte RONALD E. PRATER ____________ Appeal 2006-2880 Application 10/226,387 Technology Center 3600 ____________ Decided: January 26, 2007 ____________ Before TERRY J. OWENS, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and LINDA E. HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges. HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 USC § 134(a) from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 23-28 and 30. Claims 31-34 and 36 are allowed. Claim 29 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected independent claim. Claims 1- 22 and 35 have been canceled. We REVERSE.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013