Appeal 2006-2880 Application 10/226,387 BACKGROUND The Appellant's invention relates to a clutch housing assembly (Specification 1). Claim 23, reproduced below, is representative of the subject matter on appeal. A copy of all of the claims can be found in the appendix to the Appellant’s Brief. 23. A housing for use as a vehicle driveline component, comprising: a sidewall establishing an open end of the housing, the sidewall having a plurality of spaced splines and a strengthening member near the open end that is formed of the sidewall material having a folded over portion that is at least partially aligned with and adjacent the sidewall, an inner surface of the sidewall near the open end extending continuously and uninterrupted onto the strengthening member and establishing at least one surface of the strengthening member. The Examiner relies upon the following as evidence of unpatentability: Maruki US 5,934,126 Aug. 10, 1999 The Appellant seeks our review of the Examiner’s rejection of claims 23-28 and 30 under 35 USC § 102(b) as anticipated by Maruki. Rather than reiterate in detail the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the Examiner and the Appellant regarding this appeal, we make reference to the Examiner's Answer (mailed April 7, 2006) for the Examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejection and to the Appellant's Brief (filed August 18, 2005) and Reply Brief (filed January 3, 2006) for the Appellant's arguments. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013