The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SUN YU and DAVID A. PERRIN
____________
Appeal 2006-2924
Application 10/668,522
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: April 18, 2007
____________
Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and
ROBERT E. NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Sun Yu and David A. Perrin (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C.
§ 134 from the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-3, 7, 10, 11, and 13.
Claims 4-6, 8, 9, and 12, the only other pending claims, have been
withdrawn from consideration under 37 C.F.R. § 1.142(b) as not being
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013