The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DARIUS J. PREISLER
____________
Appeal No. 2006-2962
Application No. 10/252,177
Technology Center 1700
____________
Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, and JENNIFER
D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
Darius J. Preisler appeals from the Final Rejection (mailed November 3,
2005) of claims 25-29, all of the claims pending in the application. This Board has
jurisdiction to hear the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134(a).
This is the second appeal to the Board involving the instant application. The
first appeal (Appeal No. 2005-0361) resulted in a decision (mailed December 23,
2004) reversing the Examiner’s prior art rejections on the basis that Appellant’s
claims were indefinite. Appellant has since resolved the indefiniteness issues, and
the Examiner has reinstated the prior art rejections. These rejections are now
before us for review.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013