Ex Parte DIMARCO - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                          
                                               ___________                                                   
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ___________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ___________                                                   
                                       Ex parte MARIO DIMARCO                                                
                                               ___________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2006-2970                                                
                                          Application 09/224,3401                                            
                                          Technology Center 2800                                             
                                               ___________                                                   
                                         Decided: March 27, 2007                                             
                                               ___________                                                   
                Before JOHN C. MARTIN, LEE E. BARRETT, and SALLY C. MEDLEY,                                  
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the                         
                non-final rejection of claims 1-7 and 9-24.  Claim 8 has been canceled.                      
                      We affirm-in-part.                                                                     


                                                                                                            
                      1  Application for patent filed December 31, 1998, entitled "Modified                  
                IMA Cabinet Architecture."                                                                   



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013