Ex Parte Hageman et al - Page 1





                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                          ____________                                             
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                          ____________                                             
                     Ex parte MARY I. HAGEMAN and ELMER M. JOHNSON                                 
                                          ____________                                             
                                         Appeal 2006-2971                                          
                                      Application 10/015,256                                       
                                     Technology Center 2100                                        
                                          ____________                                             
                                     Decided: October 24, 2007                                     
                                          ____________                                             


              Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, LANCE LEONARD BARRY, and                                 
              JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                          
              LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                  


                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                    This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to 21.       

                                           INVENTION                                               
                    Appellants’ invention relates to a method, system, and computer                
              program product performing a method described by the Appellants as                   
              follows:                                                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013