Appeal 2006-2971
Application 10/015,256
line analysis indicates that a number of the claim limitations are not fairly
read on that reference.
Claim 1 contains the following limitations:
1. A method for tracking custom computer application development
profiles in a data processing system, said method comprising:
creating said profiles with a first database tool;
gathering requirements of said profiles with a second database
tool;
tracking modifications of said profiles with a third database
tool;
allowing security and authorization users access to said
profiles; and
determining whether breaches in security of said data
processing system has [have]2 occurred in each phase of
development of a computer application program.
Sziklai’s system addresses the application of a myriad of regulations
of various types in a software-based business enterprise, and provides a
method and system for tracking the changes, and applying them to the
underlying business so the latter can conform to the requirements of said
regulations. Though not exactly analogous to the claimed method for
tracking custom computer application development profiles, the teachings of
Sziklai include information that can be read on the application development
profiles in some respects.
2 Grammatical correction was proposed in Appellants’ unentered
amendment filed on March 1, 2005.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013