The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte BRIAN MICHAEL DAVIS, STEVEN MARK BALLMAN, EDWARD IVAN STAMM, KURT EDWARD YOUNG, and JAMES EDWARD GUTKNECHT ____________ Appeal 2006-2987 Application 10/661,651 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: March 28, 2007 ____________ Before CHARLES F. WARREN, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1 and 3-20. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013