Appeal 2006-3001 Application 10/747,840 Appellants' invention relates to a method of producing magazines or other print media which include personalized optical disks. Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows: 1. A method comprising: writing electronic information to an optical disk on a binding line; and associating the written optical disk with a printed product on the binding line. The prior art references of record relied upon by the Examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Harris, Jr. US 5,114,128 May 19, 1992 Hill (Hill I) US 5,388,815 Feb. 14, 1995 Pace US 6,126,201 Oct. 03, 2000 Hill (Hill II) US 6,431,453 B1 Aug. 13, 2002 Claims 1, 3, 6, 21, and 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Hill I. Claims 11, 13, 14, and 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Hill II. Claims 1 through 3, 6, 7, 21, and 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Pace in view of Hill I. Claims 4, 8, and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Pace in view of Hill I and Harris, Jr. Claim 12 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hill II in view of Harris, Jr. We refer to the Examiner's Answer (mailed March 10, 2006) for the Examiner's complete reasoning and to Appellants' Brief (filed December 23, 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013