Appeal 2006-3001
Application 10/747,840
disk on a binding line and associate the optical disk with a printed product
on the binding line. Therefore, the Examiner failed to establish a prima facie
case of obviousness for claim 12 over Hill II in view of Harris.
ORDER
The decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1, 3, 6, 11, 13, 14, 21,
and 22 under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(b) and (e) and claims 1 through 4, 6 through
9, 12, 21, and 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed.
REVERSED
hh
MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH, LLP
100 E WISCONSIN AVENUE
Suite 3300
MILWAUKEE, WI 53202
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013