The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte THOMAS E. VALIULIS and ROBERT LOUIS NORTHRUP JR. ____________ Appeal 2006-3003 Application 10/390,444 Technology Center 3600 ____________ Decided: May 16, 2007 ____________ Before TERRY J. OWENS, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and LINDA E. HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE Thomas E. Valiulis and Robert Louis Northrup Jr. (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1, 4, 7, 9, 11-13, 16, 17, and 19-23. Claims 3 and 5 stand allowed and claims 2, 10, 14, and 18 stand objected to as depending from a rejected claim. No otherPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013