Ex Parte Guler et al - Page 5

                  Appeal 2006-3156                                                                                            
                  Application 09/904,311                                                                                      

                  recites causing a processor to estimate risk attitudes and to estimate private                              
                  information.  Since we found no suggestion to include both determinations, the                              
                  combination of references fails to render claims 26, 30, 34, and 42 obvious.                                
                  Accordingly, we cannot sustain the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims                                
                  22, 26, 30, 34, 39, and 42.                                                                                 
                         We remand this application, however, for the examiner to review the                                  
                  claims for statutory subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 in view of the                                    
                  Interim Guidelines for Examination of Patent Applications for Patent                                        
                  Subject Matter Eligibility (1300 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 142 (Nov. 22, 2005)).                                
                  We will discuss claims 22 and 30 in the explanation infra.                                                  
                         The guidelines first require a determination as to whether the claims as a                           
                  whole are directed to nothing more than abstract ideas, natural phenomena, or                               
                  laws of nature.  Clearly none of the claims recites a natural phenomena nor a                               
                  law of nature, so the issue is whether they are directed to an abstract idea.  We                           
                  note that it is generally difficult to ascertain whether a process is merely an                             
                  abstract idea, particularly since claims are often drafted to include minor                                 
                  physical limitations such as data gathering steps or post-solution activity.  The                           
                  present claims are machine-implemented.  However, the question (even for the                                
                  claims which recite a computer system1, such as claim 26, or a storage                                      
                                                                                                                             
                  1 A general purpose computer or a storage medium (which includes a                                          
                  computer program capable of performing certain functions when executed                                      
                  by a machine) falls into the statutory category of machines, manufactures,                                  
                  and compositions of matter.  A claim directed to a new machine structure or                                 
                  a new storage medium structure is clearly a patentable machine or                                           
                  manufacture under §101.  However, a general purpose machine programmed                                      
                  to perform particular functions (and thus effectively a special purpose                                     
                  computer according to In re Alappat, 33 F.3d 1526, 1554, 31 USPQ2d 1545,                                    
                  1558 (Fed. Cir. 1994) (en banc)) which merely performs an abstract idea,                                    
                                                              5                                                               

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013