The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YIH-FANG CHEN,
ROBERT C. LAM, FENG DONG, and
BULENT CHAVDAR
____________
Appeal 2006-3159
Application 10/233,318
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 30, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 the final rejection of claims
1, 2, 4, 5, and 7-31. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to
35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013